{"id":303,"date":"2012-02-29T12:36:53","date_gmt":"2012-02-29T11:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/?p=303"},"modified":"2018-12-09T16:04:24","modified_gmt":"2018-12-09T15:04:24","slug":"cfpdigitalization-of-the-social","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/cfpdigitalization-of-the-social\/","title":{"rendered":"Call for Papers: The digitalization of the social and the socializing of the digital \/ Appel \u00e0 communications: La digitalisation du social et la socialisation du digital"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--:de--><a href=\"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/unil1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-310 alignnone\" title=\"unil\" src=\"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/unil1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"480\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/unil1.png 480w, http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/unil1-300x137.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#francais\">&gt; Fran\u00e7ais<\/a><\/p>\n<h4>International Conference at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, June 7th &amp; 8th, 2012<\/h4>\n<p>The \u201csocial\u201d as a unique issue \u2013 distinct from the state, politics, law or culture \u2013 was the central concept around which the new discipline of the social sciences has been formed. For Durkheim, for instance, the social constitutes the space of relations between individuals that is irreducible to the sum of these. For others, the social is based on association (from socius: companion, associate). It therefore contains all that is likely to associate, including the connections and interactions that can engage humans and nonhumans, subjects and technical objects. It is the study of the social and the exploration of its various forms that was (and still is) the basic project that constitutes the social sciences.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>For more than a decade, much has been written about the so-called &#8222;digital revolution&#8220;. Today, information and communication technology is present in most areas of social activity. As a result, digital mediation pervades almost all social relations. Administration, education, culture, friendship, love \u2013 in all these different practices, digital interfaces play a crucial role, although it is sometimes not completely clear how and to which extend. According to several analysts, the rise of digital interfaces has given birth to new modes of relations \u2013 particularly in the field of emotional relationships where the growing digitalization seems to generate significant changes at present.<\/p>\n<p>But how does this digital revolution affect the constitution of the social? How can we conceptualize the social in the digital age? Is digital media a new basis for association and the constitution of the social? And if so, does this raise the classic question of the social sciences concerning the very \u201cnature\u201d of the social in a new way? In recent years, rich and extensive work has been devoted to these questions. In reviewing these works, to main axes seem to appear: the digitalization of the social and the socializing of the digital.<!--:--><!--:en--><br \/><!--:--><!--:fr--><\/p>\n<p>The concept of the digitalization of the social answers to the proliferation of digital interfaces in social activities and interactions. Many common activities use digital interfaces as an intermediate or are affected by them. They are mediated by computer screens, keyboards, touch devices, digital protocols or search engines. These interfaces seem to play an increasing role in the creation, maintenance and extension of social relationships: based on computer algorithms that compare personal data, people meet on social networking or online dating sites. Links and relationships between individuals are created with the help of digital interfaces.<\/p>\n<p>But this digitalization of the social also intervenes in the chains of intermediaries in a way that is largely beyond the visibility and the practical scope of most users. It offers the possibility to measure online activities, to quantify, classify and store them in databases. Users may utilize this information to observe themselves and the behavior of others. But data can also be saved and used without their knowledge. The digitalization of the social encourages practices of social control and surveillance on an interpersonal as well as an institutional level.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the diagnosis of a digitalization of the social goes often hand in hand with a critique of these transformations. Many observers have shown how forms of control and surveillance increase when the social is reconfigured through digital interfaces. In this perspective, the social is &#8222;colonized&#8220; from the outside by technological processes, thereby multiplying forms of surveillance, rationalization and reification as well as reinforcing power relations. Furthermore, these processes allow new forms of appropriation and exploitation of the contributions of users online.<\/p>\n<p>There is, however, also a second perspective on the same processes, that of the socializing of the digital. Here, on the contrary, digital interfaces do less appear as places where the social is configured but rather as a space where it emerges, where different forms of usage and innovative social experiments are created. Digital interfaces are regarded as incorporations of social forms, of already existing ways of relating. Digital activities are social at their very core. A social network site for example must incorporate in its technical architecture an already existing concept of friendship, and an online dating site must relate to the established forms of building up emotional relationships in our society.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, the perspective of the socializing of the digital implies less critique of control, surveillance and power, but rather analyses the ways in which the social is adopted and reconfigured by the digital. Far from being \u201ccolonized\u201d by the machines, the social is in fact right at the very heart of them (Latour). Such a perspective goes often hand in hand with a rather positive view of the current changes. The socializing of the digital is regarded as a process that allows more egalitarian forms of sociality, especially by supporting the freedom of speech and expression and by making power relations more transparent. Furthermore, there are hopes that the social would become more \u201cdynamic\u201d in the digital age.<\/p>\n<p>These different views on the current developments raise many questions for scientific research:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>How to describe, analyze, and understand this double move of the digitalization of the social and the socializing of the digital? Should we examine these processes separately or together? How and with which conceptual tools?<\/li>\n<li>What are the implications of these developments? Could there be a superposition of the social and the digital, or is the one colonized by the other?<\/li>\n<li>Is the socializing of the digital of the same importance than the digitalization of the social? Which of both processes finally \u201cwins the battle\u201d?<\/li>\n<li>What are the differences that can be observed between the social spheres \u2013 on the market and in the sphere of work, with regard to emotional and intimate relationships or in culture and politics?<\/li>\n<li>Does the increasing importance of digital interfaces support the rationalization and reification of social relationships? How does this proceed, in which social spheres and with what consequences?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The international conference at the University of Lausanne on June 7th &amp; 8th, 2012 will try to answer some of these questions. It brings together experts in the sociology of technology, media and social theory as well as empirical research projects that analyze current developments in the field of digital activities and interfaces. The conference languages are French and English.<\/p>\n<p>We invite the submission of proposals (about 2500 Characters) to Olivier.Voirol{at}unil.ch and Kai.Droge{at}unil.ch. The deadline is March 15th, 2012. The organizing committee will notify you about the acceptance two or three weeks later.<\/p>\n<p><em><br \/>Organizing committee:<\/em><br \/>Olivier Voirol (UNIL) Olivier.Voirol{at}unil.ch<br \/>Kai Dr\u00f6ge (UNIL) Kai.Droge{at}unil.ch<br \/>Alba Brizzi (UNIL) Alba.Brizzi{at}unil.ch<\/p>\n<p>Supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Institute of Social Sciences (UNIL).<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"francais\">Colloque international, Universit\u00e9 de Lausanne, Suisse, 7 et 8 juin 2012<\/h4>\n<p>Les sciences sociales se sont constitu\u00e9es autour de la question du social, ce domaine singulier distinct \u00e0 la fois de l\u2019Etat, du politique, du juridique ou encore du culturel. Pour Durkheim, le social est par exemple cet espace de relations entre individus qui est irr\u00e9ductible \u00e0 la somme de ces derniers. Pour d\u2019autres, le social rel\u00e8ve de l\u2019association (de socius, compagnon, associ\u00e9), incluant tout ce qui est susceptible de s\u2019associer, et notamment les connections et les interactions que peuvent engager des \u00eatres humains et des non-humains, des sujets et des objets techniques. C\u2019est l\u2019\u00e9tude du social et l\u2019exploration de ses diff\u00e9rentes manifestations qui fonde le projet des sciences sociales.<\/p>\n<p>Depuis une d\u00e9cennie, la dite \u00ab r\u00e9volution num\u00e9rique \u00bb a fait couler beaucoup d\u2019encre. La pr\u00e9sence croissante de technologies de l\u2019information et de la communication dans la plupart des secteurs de l\u2019activit\u00e9 sociale a fait du digital une m\u00e9diation omnipr\u00e9sente dans quasiment tous les rapports sociaux. Dans les pratiques administratives, p\u00e9dagogiques, culturelles, relationnelles, amicales, les interfaces digitales jouent aujourd\u2019hui un r\u00f4le central, sans que l\u2019on sache toujours exactement lequel. Selon plusieurs analystes, la mont\u00e9e des interfaces digitales a par exemple donn\u00e9 naissance \u00e0 des modalit\u00e9s relationnelles in\u00e9dites, notamment sur le plan des relations affectives dans lesquelles cette digitalisation croissante semble susciter des changements importants \u00e0 l\u2019heure actuelle.<\/p>\n<p>Mais quelle est au juste la port\u00e9e de ce tournant digital sur la constitution du social ? Comment penser le social \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re du digital ? Les m\u00e9dias num\u00e9riques deviendraient-ils de nouveaux vecteurs du social et de l\u2019association ? Si tel \u00e9tait le cas, la question classique des sciences sociales sur la \u00ab nature \u00bb du social ne s\u2019en trouverait-t-elle pas pos\u00e9e \u00e0 nouveaux frais ? Ces interrogations ont fait l\u2019objet de riches r\u00e9flexions et de nombreux travaux au cours de ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es, parmi lesquels deux axes se d\u00e9gagent : celui de la digitalisation du social et celui de la socialisation du digital.<br \/><!--:--><br \/>La digitalisation du social renvoie \u00e0 cette multiplication des interfaces num\u00e9riques dans les activit\u00e9s et les interactions sociales. D\u2019une part, une s\u00e9rie d\u2019activit\u00e9s courantes se configure par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire d\u2019interfaces digitales ou sont affect\u00e9es par ces derni\u00e8res ; elles sont m\u00e9diatis\u00e9es par des \u00e9crans, des claviers, des \u00e9crans tactiles, des protocoles num\u00e9riques ou des moteurs de recherche. D\u2019autre part, ces interfaces semblent jouer un r\u00f4le croissant dans la cr\u00e9ation, le maintien et l\u2019extension de relations sociales : on se rencontre par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire d\u2019algorithmes croisant des donn\u00e9es personnelles sur les r\u00e9seaux sociaux ou les sites de rencontre, des liens se cr\u00e9ent entre individus en fonction d\u2019interfaces, etc.<\/p>\n<p>Or cette digitalisation du social fait intervenir des cha\u00eenes d\u2019interm\u00e9diaires dont les modalit\u00e9s de fonctionnement \u00e9chappent largement \u00e0 la visibilit\u00e9 et \u00e0 la port\u00e9e pratique de la plupart des usagers. Elle offre notamment la possibilit\u00e9 de mesurer des activit\u00e9s en ligne, de les quantifier, de les classer et de les r\u00e9pertorier dans des bases de donn\u00e9es. Si ces donn\u00e9es servent aux usagers pour s\u2019observer eux-m\u00eames et observer les autres, elles peuvent \u00e9galement \u00eatre enregistr\u00e9es et utilis\u00e9es \u00e0 leur insu. La digitalisation du social encouragerait du coup les pratiques de contr\u00f4le et de surveillance autant au niveau interindividuel qu\u2019au niveau institutionnel.<\/p>\n<p>La mise \u00e0 jour de cette digitalisation du social est souvent all\u00e9e de pair avec une critique de cette derni\u00e8re. Ce que moult observateurs ont alors mis en \u00e9vidence est l\u2019accroissement des formes de contr\u00f4le, le d\u00e9veloppement de modes de surveillance au fur et \u00e0 mesure que le social se reconfigure par le biais des interfaces digitales. Le social serait comme \u00ab colonis\u00e9 \u00bb de l\u2019ext\u00e9rieur par ces processus technologiques en d\u00e9cuplant les modes de surveillance, de rationalisation, de r\u00e9ification et en renfor\u00e7ant les rapports de pouvoir. Ces processus permettraient en outre des formes in\u00e9dites d\u2019appropriation et d\u2019exploitation des contributions en ligne des usagers.<\/p>\n<p>Ce m\u00eame processus est toutefois examin\u00e9, \u00e9galement, \u00e0 l\u2019aune d\u2019une autre perspective, celle de la socialisation du digital. Par l\u00e0, il faut entendre le mouvement inverse par lequel les interfaces digitales apparaissent moins comme des espaces de configuration du social que comme des \u00e9manations du social, des usages sp\u00e9cifiques, des formes innovantes d\u2019exp\u00e9rimentation sociale. On consid\u00e8re alors que ces interfaces ne sont autres que l\u2019incorporation de formes institu\u00e9es du social, de mani\u00e8res existantes d\u2019entrer en relation. Les activit\u00e9s digitales seraient ainsi sociales en leur c\u0153ur m\u00eame. Un r\u00e9seau social doit par exemple incorporer dans son architecture technique une conception reconnue de l\u2019amiti\u00e9 comme un site de rencontre doit incorporer une mani\u00e8re de d\u00e9velopper des contacts affectifs.<\/p>\n<p>Par cons\u00e9quent, la perspective de la socialisation du digital, implique moins un questionnement sur le contr\u00f4le, la surveillance et le pouvoir qu\u2019une mise \u00e0 jour des processus d\u2019appropriation et de reconfiguration du social gr\u00e2ce au digital. Loin d\u2019\u00eatre \u00ab colonis\u00e9 \u00bb par les machines, le social serait au contraire au c\u0153ur de ces derni\u00e8res (Latour). Une telle perspective va souvent de pair avec une appr\u00e9ciation globalement positive des changements en cours, la socialisation du digital permettrait des formes plus \u00e9galitaires de socialit\u00e9 notamment en promouvant la libre expression et la libert\u00e9 de chacun tout autant que la \u00ab transparence \u00bb du pouvoir. Le digital permettrait alors de nourrir bien des espoirs sur les possibilit\u00e9s de \u00ab dynamisation \u00bb du social.<\/p>\n<p>Ce double constat soul\u00e8ve plusieurs questions pour la recherche actuelle :<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Comment d\u00e9crire, rendre compte, et comprendre ce double geste de digitalisation du social et de socialisation du digital ? Ces deux processus doivent-ils \u00eatre examin\u00e9s s\u00e9par\u00e9ment ou alors de mani\u00e8re conjointe ? Comment et \u00e0 l\u2019aide de quels outils conceptuels ?<\/li>\n<li>Quelles sont les cons\u00e9quences de ces d\u00e9veloppements ? Peut-on envisager un recouvrement du social et du digital, une superposition, ou alors une colonisation de l\u2019un sur l\u2019autre ?<\/li>\n<li>La socialisation du digital est-elle du m\u00eame ordre, et a-t-elle le m\u00eame \u00ab poids \u00bb que la digitalisation du social ? Y a-il, entre ces deux processus, un qui finit par \u00ab gagner la bataille \u00bb ?<\/li>\n<li>Quelles sont les diff\u00e9rences entre les sph\u00e8res d\u2019activit\u00e9 sociale &#8211; sur le march\u00e9 et le lieu de travail, dans les liens affectifs et les relations amoureuses, la culture et la politique ?<\/li>\n<li>Dans quelle mesure assiste-t-on \u00e0 travers la mont\u00e9e des interfaces digitales \u00e0 des formes de rationalisation et de r\u00e9ification des relations sociales ? Comment s\u2019op\u00e8rent ces processus, dans quelles sph\u00e8res et avec quelles cons\u00e9quences ?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>C\u2019est pour tenter de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ces questions qu\u2019un colloque international est organis\u00e9 les 7 et 8 juin 2012 \u00e0 l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Lausanne. Il r\u00e9unira des sp\u00e9cialistes des domaines de sociologie de la technique, des th\u00e9oriciens sociaux, des recherches empiriques sur les activit\u00e9s et les interfaces digitales actuelles. Les conf\u00e9rences seront pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es en fran\u00e7ais et en anglais.<\/p>\n<p>Les propositions de communication (env. 2\u2019500 signes) devront \u00eatre adress\u00e9es par mail \u00e0 Olivier.Voirol{at}unil.ch et Kai.Droge{at}unil.ch jusqu\u2019au 15 mars 2012, la r\u00e9ponse du comit\u00e9 d\u2019organisation suivra trois semaines plus tard.<\/p>\n<p><em>Comit\u00e9 d\u2019organisation :<\/em><br \/>Olivier Voirol (UNIL) Olivier.Voirol{at}unil.ch<br \/>Kai Dr\u00f6ge (UNIL) Kai.Droge{at}unil.ch<br \/>Alba Brizzi (UNIL) Alba.Brizzi{at}unil.ch<\/p>\n<p>Soutenu par le Fonds national suisse de la recherche scientifique (FNS) et l\u2019Institut des sciences sociales (UNIL).<!--:--><\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&gt; Fran\u00e7ais International Conference at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, June 7th &amp; 8th, 2012 The \u201csocial\u201d as a unique issue \u2013 distinct from the state, politics, law or culture \u2013 was the central concept around which the new discipline of the social sciences has been formed. For Durkheim, for instance, the social constitutes the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9,5,7,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=303"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":411,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303\/revisions\/411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/romanticentrepreneur.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}